Decent Wiki... Needs More Info

I've noticed going through a lot of these pages that there's a lot of assumption of facts in some of the articles. It'd be great if there could be a more collaborative effort when it comes to the unconfirmed theories, and looking for actual evidence to back these theories up. Some of it is minor, just little pet-peeves... but some of it sounds far-fetched and is presented in a way that makes casual readers think it's fact without actual sources.

Granted, I was NOT here for the weird vandal-raid that happened a bit ago; I've only seen the aftermath comments on the wiki pages. It could be that the original wiki was more polished and put together and it's still just in recovery.

Regardless, there's a lot that could be done to improve this wiki; I'll try to do my part, as well.